गुरूनहत्वा हि महानुभावान्
श्रेयो भोक्तुं भैक्ष्यमपीह लोके ।
हत्वार्थकामांस्तु गुरूनिहैव
भुञ्जीय भोगान्रुधिरप्रदिग्धान् ॥
It would be better to live in this world by begging than to kill these great teachers. If we kill them, all the enjoyments of wealth and pleasure we gain will be tainted with their blood.
Arjuna continues to express his reluctance to fight. He considers his teachers, especially Bhishma and Drona, as noble and worthy of respect. For him, killing them for the sake of power or enjoyment appears morally unacceptable.
He even suggests that living a life of hardship, such as begging, would be preferable to gaining a kingdom at the cost of their lives. The idea of enjoying wealth obtained through such actions seems to him deeply disturbing, as it would be associated with the destruction of those he reveres.
This reflects how strongly Arjuna’s thinking is influenced by his sense of respect and emotional attachment, leading him to question the value of victory itself.
Administrative Reflections
This verse highlights how ethical discomfort can arise when actions required by duty appear to conflict with personal values or respect for individuals. In leadership and public roles, individuals may face decisions where outcomes involve difficult trade-offs. Such situations require careful judgment to distinguish between emotional hesitation and principled reasoning. Responsible decision-making involves evaluating both the consequences of action and the responsibilities that come with one’s role.