UPSC Mains — Previous Year Question
Question
Discuss the position of the Governor in the federal polity of India. What is the nature of his power while giving assent to a bill passed by the State Legislature ? Is he bound by the aid and advice of his Council of Ministers in all his functions?
Model Answer
The Governor occupies a dual constitutional position—acting as the nominal executive head of the State and serving as a vital link between the Union and the States. However, recurring frictions over legislative assent and discretionary powers have made the gubernatorial office a focal point of Centre-State constitutional contestation.
Position of the Governor in India’s Federal Polity
- Constitutional Head of State: Executive authority of the State is vested in the Governor under Article 154, exercisable on the aid and advice of an elected Council of Ministers.
- Federal Bridge vs. Perceived Overreach: Appointed by the President under Article 155 and holding office during presidential pleasure (Article 156), the Governor links the federal tiers; however, this tenure vulnerability often fuels perceptions of partisan intervention on behalf of the Union.
- Constitutional Sentinel: The Governor is designed to function as an independent constitutional umpire ensuring constitutional propriety, rather than an active political competitor to the state executive.
Nature of Power Regarding Assent to Bills (Article 200)
- Constitutional Options Available: When a Bill passed by the State Legislature is presented, the Governor has four courses of action under Article 200:
- Grant Assent: The Bill becomes an enforceable Act.
- Withhold Assent: An exceptional power that terminates the legislative measure.
- Return for Reconsideration: Applicable only to non-Money Bills with suggested amendments. If repassed by the Legislature with or without amendment, the Governor must grant assent.
- Reserve for Presidential Consideration: Mandatory under the second proviso to Article 200 if the Bill derogates from the constitutional powers of the High Court.
- No “Pocket Veto”: The phrase “as soon as possible” in the proviso to Article 200 implies an obligation of expedition. The Governor cannot sit on Bills indefinitely to stall an elected legislature.
- Judicial Interpretation:
- In State of Tamil Nadu v. Governor (2025), the Supreme Court emphasized that prolonged inaction cannot be utilized to frustrate the constitutional will of an elected legislature.
- The 2025 Presidential Reference clarified that while courts cannot prescribe rigid legislative timetables or create “deemed assent”, gubernatorial inaction remains subject to judicial scrutiny against arbitrariness.
Scope of Aid and Advice (Article 163)
- General Rule of Binding Advice: Under Article 163(1), the Governor is bound by the aid and advice of the Council of Ministers in all executive functions, except where the Constitution expressly requires the exercise of personal discretion.
- Affirmation in Jurisprudence: In Shamsher Singh (1974) and Nabam Rebia (2016), the apex court ruled that the Governor is a formal constitutional head and does not possess a general, parallel executive authority.
- Permissible Discretionary Functions:
- Appointing a Chief Minister in a fractured/hung assembly.
- Dismissing a government that has lost legislative confidence but refuses to step down.
- Recommending President’s Rule under Article 356 (subject to objective material scrutiny under S.R. Bommai, 1994).
- Special administrative responsibilities under Article 371 and tribal governance under the Fifth and Sixth Schedules.
Way Forward and Institutional Reforms
- Statutory Timelines for Assent: Implement the recommendations of the NCRWC (2002) and the Punchhi Commission (2010) to amend Articles 200 and 201, setting a clear time-bound limit (e.g., six months) for deciding on State Bills.
- Depoliticizing Appointments: Adopt the Sarkaria Commission (1988) guidelines: appoint eminent, non-partisan figures outside active politics in effective consultation with the state Chief Minister.
- Security of Tenure: Grant Governors a fixed five-year tenure, insulating the office from sudden mid-term removals.
The Governor’s office represents a constitutional safety valve, not an executive deadweight. Its institutional legitimacy depends on practicing constitutional morality, procedural restraint, and strict political neutrality.